Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Bookert

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 23, 1998No. 2749PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER WITHDRAWING AND SUBSTITUTING OPINION

2Per curiam

After careful consideration of the Petition for Rehearing, the Court hereby withdraws the original opinion and substitutes the following opinion. The Court is unable to discover and material fact or principle of law that has been either overlooked or disregarded and, hence, there is no basis for granting a rehearing. It is, therefore, ordered that the Petition for Rehearing be denied.

/s/ Carol Connor, J. /s/ Ralph King Anderson, J. /s/ Thomas E. Huff, J. ANDERSON, Judge:

This is a declaratory judgment action in which an insurer, State Farm Mutual…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. HowserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Chapman v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. Hite v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Home Insurance v. ToweSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. South Carolina Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n v. YensenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Auto World of Orangeburg, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BookertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Wright Ex Rel. Estate of Rogers v. North Area Taxi, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API