Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Bookert

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 1999No. 25021PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’, decision in State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bookert, 330 S.C. 221, 499 S.E.2d 480 (Ct.App.1997). We reverse.

State Farm brought this declaratory judgment action to determine the extent of coverage it owed under the under-insured motorist provision of an automobile policy issued to respondent Mary Bookert (Mary). The parties stipulated to these facts: Mary’s son, respondent Michael Bookert, is an insured under Mary’s policy. Michael and some friends stopped at a Hardee’s, where two soldiers and about fifteen other young men became…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. AytesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BookertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Peagler Ex Rel. Estate of Thompson v. USAA InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Holmes v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
  5. Nationwide Property & Casualty Co. v. Lain Ex Rel. Estate of LainDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API