Legal Opinion

Fritz v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1901No. S.F. No. 2377PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte,j.

—This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco sustaining the demurrer to a complaint filed by a taxpayer in a proceeding to enjoin the board of supervisors and the mayor of said city and county from taking any further action in pursuance of certain proceedings previously inaugurated, and having for their object the issuance of bonds of said city and county, and the purchase of lands for park purposes from the proceeds thereof. The proceedings leading up to the proposed issuance of these bonds are assailed at many places, but the court…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCue v. BlaisdellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. City of Long Beach v. LisenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Central Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API