Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McCue v. Blaisdell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1909PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Application by the state, on relation of T. F. MoCue, Attorney General, for ;a (writ of certiorari to> be directed to- Alfred Blaisdell, as Secretary of State, and J. W. Fabrick, as County Auditor of Ward county.

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

Section 168 of the Constitution of this state, as far as pertinent to the present controversy, reads as. follows: “All changes in the boundaries of organized counties, before taking effect, shall be submitted to the electors of the county or .counties to be affected thereby at a general election and be adopted by a majority of all the legal votes cast in each county at such election.” At the general election in 1908 several propositions for the division of, and the creation of, new counties from the present county of Ward were duly submitted to the electors of that county. None of the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Yesler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. County of Cass v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. The People Ex Rel. Furman v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Straughan v. MeyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. City of Bismarck v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Rausch v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API