Legal Opinion

State v. Stinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1965No. 722PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

When at defendant’s trial at the May 1964 Criminal Session a judgment of nonsuit was entered by the court on his motion, it had “the force and effect of a verdict of ‘not guilty’ as to such defendant” of the charges averred in the indictment on which he was being tried. G.S. 15-173; S. v. Smith, 236 N.C. 748, 73 S.E. 2d 901.

If there is anything settled beyond reconsideration in the criminal jurisprudence of England and America, it is that no one shall twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense, both in law and in fact. S. v. Hicks, 233 N.C. 511, 64 S.E. 2d 871; Ex parte Lange, 18 Wall.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Lokos v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. State v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. JenerettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API