State v. Cooper
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
f 1 In addition to various counts involving manufacture, possession, and delivery, a jury found Richard Cooper guilty of endangering his girl friend’s children by operating a methamphetamine manufacturing operation in the children’s residence. RCW 9A.42.100, the child endangerment statute, makes it a crime for a person to knowingly or intentionally expose a dependent child to methamphetamine. Cooper argues that the term “person” in RCW 9A.42.100 encompasses only a child’s parent, custodian, or caregiver, not him. We disagree. We affirm the Court of Appeals and hold that by its plain language,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Ainsworth v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Rebecca Nelson v. James DuvallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington, V Justin Moses And Aimee MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.