Legal Opinion

State v. Cooper

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. 76164-7PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

f 1 In addition to various counts involving manufacture, possession, and delivery, a jury found Richard Cooper guilty of endangering his girl friend’s children by operating a methamphetamine manufacturing operation in the children’s residence. RCW 9A.42.100, the child endangerment statute, makes it a crime for a person to knowingly or intentionally expose a dependent child to methamphetamine. Cooper argues that the term “person” in RCW 9A.42.100 encompasses only a child’s parent, custodian, or caregiver, not him. We disagree. We affirm the Court of Appeals and hold that by its plain language,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ainsworth v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Rebecca Nelson v. James DuvallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington, V Justin Moses And Aimee MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API