Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, V Justin Moses And Aimee Moses

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 12, 2016No. 46357-1-II; 46377-6-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMelnick, J.

¶1 — Justin Purnell Moses and Aimee Maxine Moses 1 appeal their convictions of criminal mistreatment in the second degree 2 for causing substantial bodily harm by withholding the basic necessities of life from M.A.

¶2 Justin argues the trial court erred when it (1) admitted redacted versions of Aimee’s interview with Detective Thomas Catey in violation of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to confront witnesses, (2) denied his motion to sever, (3) applied the wrong legal standard in admitting the child hearsay statements under RCW 9A.44-.120, (4) instructed the jurors on the abuse of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, V Treven A. PerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. State Of Washington v. Adrian Tubis BroussardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. State Of Washington v. Damien R. Davis & Marcus A. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State Of Washington v. Robert Lee WillisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington, Resp. v. Daniel Galeana Ramirez, Alejandro Ramirez, And Steven Russell, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API