Legal Opinion

Rickman v. . Holshouser

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The right of the assignee of a chose in action arising out of contract to sue therefor in his own name has been declared by statute (C. S., 446), and has been upheld in numerous decisions of this Court. Fertilizer Works v. Newbern, 210 N. C., 9, 185 S. E., 471; Horne-Wilson, Inc., v. Wiggins Bros., Inc., 203 N. C., 85, 164 S. E., 365; Trust Co. v. Williams, 201 N. C., 464, 160 S. E., 484; Craig v. Stewart, 163 N. C., 531, 79 S. E., 100; Vaughan v. Davenport, 159 N. C., 369, 74 S. E., 967; Harris v. Burwell, 65 N. C., 584.

The contention of defendants that the assignment of wages by an employee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. . BurwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Vaughan v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Armour Fertilizer Works v. NewbernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Craig & Wilson v. Stewart & JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. . HolshouserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Morris v. HolshouserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Domingue v. NEHEMIAH II, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API