Legal Opinion

Morris v. . Holshouser

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1941PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action to recover $27.50 alleged to be due plaintiff by reason of a sale or assignment to him of the wages of one of defendant's employees.

The action was instituted in the court of a justice of the peace, and upon appeal to the Superior Court was heard upon an agreed statement of facts. From this it appears that one of defendant's employees executed a power of attorney to one Rickman to sell his wages due and to become due in the sum of $27.50; that under this authority plaintiff purchased the employee's wages in that sum which was paid to the employee less a commission of $2.50;…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Alford v. Textile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API