Vaughan v. . Davenport
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Ferguson, J., at March Term, 1911, of Pitt. This case comes before the Court upon a petition to rebear. It is reported in 157 N. O., page 156.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Upon the former hearing of this ease it was held by the Court that the plaintiffs could not recover because it affirmatively appeared that the plaintiffs had assigned the contract for the purchase of the cotton to Hogan & Co., who are not parties to this action, and upon that ground it was held that the motion of the defendant for nonsuit should have been granted on the ground that the evidence discloses that the plaintiffs were not the owners of the claim sued on.
It is contended by the plaintiff upon the rehearing that there is no evidence that Vaughan & Barnes, the plaintiffs, have assigned…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bryant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- R. G. Chapman & Co. v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Martin v. . Mask.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- McManus v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Meadows v. . MarshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Gulf States Creosoting Co. v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Martin v. . Mask.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Nowell v. . BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.