Legal Opinion

People v. Seiler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1922No. Crim. No. 1012PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The defendant was convicted on a charge of manslaughter; he moved for a new trial; the motion was denied; he made a motion in arrest of judgment and that motion was denied; and he has appealed from the judgment and the order denying him a new trial.

The appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. The evidence shows that on the evening of the twenty-second day of April, 1921, the defendant was driving an automobile from Burlingame north toward San Francisco. At the point known as Death Curve, which is located below the cemeteries and between Burlingame and San…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Schultz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. GoetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  5. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. CrossanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. State v. BrooksIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API