Legal Opinion

State v. Cotton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1991No. 9015SC554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant has not addressed his second assignment in his brief. It is therefore deemed abandoned. N.C. R. App. P., Rule 28. In his remaining assignments, defendant contends that the court erred in admitting certain testimony, in failing to dismiss the charges against him based on a variance between the indictment and the evidence, and in its charge to the jury. We find no error.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in permitting a witness to testify to statements made by Thomas Morrow. The trial court conducted a voir dire hearing and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. LovelaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. CollingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  4. State v. CollingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. GloverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API