State v. Stephens
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
In general, a “statement is admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule if it is ... a statement by a coconspirator of such party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 801(d) (2004). Defendant argues that the statements in this case were made prior to the formation of the conspiracy and thus, do not fit in this exception. Although we agree that the hearsay statements allowed in this case were made prior to the formation of the conspiracy, we uphold Defendant’s conviction for armed robbery because the error was harmless.
Regarding a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. ALBRITTAINCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017