Legal Opinion
Kontner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1947No. 30954 and 30955PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
The unemployment-compensation statutes are Sections 1345-1 to 1346-5, inclusive, General Code. No question is made in these cases that claimants failed to comply with all the procedural requirements with reference to their claims for unemployment compensation. The decisions of the administrator, the referee and the board of review were based on the proposition that neither claimant was available for work within the meaning of the law, and the solution of that question must govern our decisions.
Neither the Common Pleas Court nor the Court of Appeals wrote opinions in these cases so we do not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. Powhatan Mining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Jacobs v. Office of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Copeland v. Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mohler v. Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Moulton v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Claim of SappIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Keough v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Putnam v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.