Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1946No. 32104PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an action to review a decision of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission and the Board of Review denying plaintiff’s claim for benefits under the Oklahoma Employment Security Act, ch. 6, Title 40, O.S. 1941. The court sustained the order of the Board of Review denying the claim, and plaintiff appeals.

Claimant is a married man, about 63 years of age, and resides, with his wife and two children, at Meeker, Okla., a town of about 500 population. He filed his claim with the commission December 2, 1943. The claim, among other things, states:

“Claimant also states that he contacted the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Queener v. Magnet Mills, Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Mills v. South Carolina Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. S. S. Kresge Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Self v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Walton v. WilhelmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Keough v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API