Legal Opinion

State v. Dokken

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1992No. C0-92-747Published

1Opinion of the Court

487 N.W.2d 914 (1992)

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,

v.

Eric James DOKKEN, Respondent.

No. C0-92-747.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 18, 1992.

Review Denied September 30, 1992.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, James C. Backstrom, Dakota Co. Atty., James M. Crow, Asst. Co. Atty., Hastings, for appellant.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Mark D. Nyvold, Spec. Asst. Public Defender, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, P.J., and RANDALL and FOLEY[*], JJ.

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The state appeals a downward dispositional sentencing departure from the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. HennumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. BestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API