Legal Opinion
Perry v. Borough of Swedesboro
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 30, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
214 N.J. Super. 488 (1986)
520 A.2d 410
CARL PERRY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOROUGH OF SWEDESBORO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 3, 1986.
Decided December 30, 1986.
Before Judges DREIER, SHEBELL and STERN.
Caryl M. Amana argued the cause for appellant (Caryl M. Amana, on the brief).
Charles R. Iannuzzi argued the cause for respondent (Charles R. Iannuzzi, on the brief).
2Per curiam
Plaintiff has appealed from a dismissal of his complaint for additional compensation based upon his being required to be on duty or on call as a police officer for a 24-hour…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vittorio Mineo, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Hoboken Local No. 2 v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- Perry v. Borough of SwedesboroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Thurmond v. City of Union City, Tenn.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Lombardo v. HoagNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Last Chance Development v. KeanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Allen v. FauverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- State v. HicksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Shayegan v. BaldwinNew Jersey Tax Court · 1987