Legal Opinion

Hoboken Local No. 2 v. City of Hoboken

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 23, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ackeeson, S. C. C.

Plaintiff, an unincorporated association, sues as the assignee of the claims of sixty-six members of the uniformed paid police department of the City of Hoboken for compensation alleged to be due to them for serving one day in each week, from March 12th, 1935, to the institution of this action, in excess of the limitation of six days of service in any one week prescribed by R. S. 40:47-17; N. J. S. A. 40:47-17.

The statute (R. S. 40:47-17; N. J. S. A. 40:47-17) provides as follows:

*336“The days of employment of uniformed members of any paid police department in any municipality,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haythorn v. Van Keuren & SonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. Potter v. Borough of MetuchenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  3. Bourgeois v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  4. Eckert v. Town of West OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  5. Jersey City Supply Co. v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Town of Worland v. Odell & JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Perry v. Borough of SwedesboroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Samuel v. WildwoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API