Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. Hoag

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 30, 1993PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

269 N.J. Super. 36 (1993)

634 A.2d 550

KEITH LOMBARDO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

EDWARD M. HOAG AND RONALD NIEMEYER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND ADINA GREEN, NEILLEY'S LONG BAR AND JOHN DOE BAR-LIQUOR STORE, FICTITIOUSLY NAMED, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 18, 1993.

Decided November 30, 1993.

Before Judges PETRELLA, CONLEY and VILLANUEVA.

Charles X. Gormally argued the cause for appellant (Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer & Gladstone, attorneys; Mr. Gormally and Lance A. Posner of counsel; Mr. Gormally and Steven L. Fox, on the brief).

Ro…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. State v. ReldanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Lanzet v. GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. State v. HaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Iseberg v. GrossIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates Trump Taj Mahal, Inc. Donald Trump the Trump Taj Mahal Corporation Tm/gp Corporation. Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Boardwalk Regency CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Cintrón Adorno v. GómezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999
  5. Collins v. ThomasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API