Legal Opinion

Sundquist v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1990No. C9-90-80PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals that reversed a compensation judge’s findings with respect to equitable apportionment of liability between successive employers and their workers’ compensation liability insurers and the employee’s entitlement to attorney fees, while affirming the compensation judge’s assessment of penalties. We affirm the assessment of penalties but reverse and reinstate the compensation judge’s determinations with respect to equitable apportionment and attorney fees.

I

Walter E. Sundquist filed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Lease v. Pemtom, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. DeNardo v. Divine Redeemer Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Kirchner v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Banken v. Lac Qui Parle Coop OilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Hufnagel v. Deer River Health Care Ctr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API