Sundby v. City of St. Peter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
We review on certiorari a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) affirming a workers’ compensation judge’s determination that, under Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 4 (2004), Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) child’s benefits are to be included when calculating the amount of reduction in an employer’s payment of workers’ compensation benefits. We conclude that SSDI child’s benefits are includable in the calculation to reduce payments; therefore, we affirm.
The parties stipulated to the underlying facts. On December 31, 1986, Timothy…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stuckey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Stuckey v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Owens Ex Rel. Owens v. Water Gremlin Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Wilken v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Botler v. Wagner GreenhousesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Bobby Lykins, by George Duranske, conservator, Respondent, vs. Anderson Contracting, Inc., and SFM Mutual Insurance Co.,...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Oseland by Oseland v. Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019