Legal Opinion

Butler Bros. v. Mason

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1924No. File No. 5432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

Defendant Mason sold his mercantile business, stock, fixtures, store building, and lot to defendant Burnett. Plaintiff, a creditor of Mason, asked for judgment against both defendants. Recovery against Burnett was predicated upon the allegation that in so far as the sale of the stock and fixtures was concerned the Bulk Sales Law (sections 914-921, Rev. Code 1919) was not complied with. Defendant Burnett only was personally served with process. The trial court made findings of fact and therefrom concluded that defendant Burnett was entitled to a dismissal of the action upon its merits. From…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Stuart v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Albright v. StockhillMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Brown v. KossoveCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  5. Interstate Shirt & Collar Co. v. WindhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler Bros. v. MasonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Dakota Trust & Savings Bank of Sioux Falls v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Hronik v. WartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. H. C. Bay Co. v. RidnourSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. New First National Bank v. LightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API