Legal Opinion

H. C. Bay Co. v. Ridnour

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1925No. File No. 5308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This action was brought' by plaintiffs (respondents here), as creditors of one Ridnour, against Ridnour and Costain Bros, for alleged violations of what is commonly called' the Bulk Sales Law. (Rev. Code 1919, § 914 et seq.). Findings and judgment, were in favor of respondents, and defendants Co-stain Bros, appeal. No record was settled. The appeal is from the judgment alone.

It is appellants’ contention that the trial court erred in its second and third conclusions of law:(1) I-n holding", them trustees in the disbursement of the purchase price of the stock of merchandise regardless of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Linn County Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Coach v. GageOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Brown v. KossoveCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  5. Peck v. HibbenIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New First National Bank v. LightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API