Legal Opinion

Hronik v. Warty

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

— This is a suit, as indicated in the statement, by a trustee in bankruptcy against a purchaser of merchandise from the bankrupt. 'The pertinent question for decision involves the interpretation and application of the provisions of the so-called Bulk Sales Law of Iowa to the record facts.

In brief, was there a substantial compliance with the statutory provisions in making the sale in question? At the outset, it may be observed that the plaintiff filed a motion to strike the defendant’s answer, as amended. This was, in legal effect, an equitable demurrer, under Section 11130, Code of 1924.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Joplin Supply Co. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Interstate Shirt & Collar Co. v. WindhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Carnall v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. National City Bank v. Huey & Martin Drug Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Evans v. HerbransonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Damicus v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API