Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Nonnamaker v. Kay County Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1926No. 16654PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

A gas explosion destroyed a building situated in Pon-ca City, owned by Franklin C. Nonnamaker. The owner commenced his action against the Kay County Gas Company for damages for the destruction of the building. The trial of the cause resulted in a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed the cause here for review.

The negligence charged in his petition to support recovery against the defendant is in substance: That the defendánt negligently made changes in its pipe line in an alley by the building of the plaintiff; that the negligent manner in which the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Luengene v. Consumers Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Memphis Consol. Gas & Electric Co. v. CreightonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. Sipple ex rel. Sipple v. Laclede Gaslight Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Klein v. MuhlhausenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Mountcastle v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. First Congregational ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Staff v. Montana Petroleum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bellefuil v. WILLMAR GAS CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Briscoe v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Atkinson ex rel. Atkinson v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API