Dobrentai v. Piehl
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered December 4, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for an injunction and damages, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The purpose of the plaintiff Dobrentai in commencing this action in the superior court was to have the defendants Piehl, and Jewell and Bunting, copartners, enjoined from interfering with his concession to sell refreshments in front of the building known as the Steeplechase, at Alki Beach, in King county, and incidentally to recover damages for such interference. We are here concerned only with *434the judgment for damages, awarded by the court upon trial without a jury, against the defendant Piehl for the sum of $290, from which he has appealed.
The principal question for our consideration is as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cantwell v. NunnWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Hockersmith v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Robinson v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
- Whitlock v. MancietOregon Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shockley v. Travelers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Burleigh v. Consumers Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Hendrix v. HendrixWashington Supreme Court · 1918