Burleigh v. Consumers Publishing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered February 21, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract,- tried to the- court.
1Opinion of the Court
Main, J. —
The purpose of this action was to recover the balance alleged to be due on account of salary earned. The defendant, Consumers Publishing Company, is a corporation. After the action was begun, A. J. Goddard, being then a stockholder in the corporation, filed a complaint of intervention. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. From this judgment, the defendant and intervener appeal.
No statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been brought to this court. Consequently the only question for determination is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Cantwell v. NunnWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Dobrentai v. PiehlWashington Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shockley v. Travelers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Clyde Equipment Co. v. FioritoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Hendrix v. HendrixWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Authorized Supply Company of Arizona, a Corporation v. Swift & Company, a Corporation Arizona York Refrigeration Company, a Corporation, and Southern Arizona York Refrigeration Company, a Corporation, Arizona York Refrigeration Company, a Corporation, and Southern Arizona York Refrigeration Company, a Corporation v. Swift & Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Evans v. RubleeWashington Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.