Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. Manciet

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

This was an action on a promissory note executed by Pierre Mancient, appellants’ testator, and E. TL. Whitlock, and payable to respondent’s order. The issues made by the pleadings were: 1. Whether Manciet was merely an accommodation maker. 2. Whether the note had been satisfied and discharged before the action was brought. The cause was tried by the court, who found that the note was executed to the respondent for a valuable consideration, and that immediately after its receipt he “indorsed the same and turned it over to the bank of Ladd & Tilton for the benefit of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
  2. Lubbering v. KohlbrecherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. Palmer v. GurnseyNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. Garlock v. GeortnerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. Hayden v. GoodnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. S. S. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Dobrentai v. PiehlWashington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API