Legal Opinion
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Patch
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1986No. C3-85-2084PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant Reinsurance Association of Minnesota appeals a summary judgment determining respondent Richard Patch’s personal liability insurance policy issued by appellant provides coverage for the injuries sustained by respondent- James Lloyd, which allegedly occurred in part, because of Patch’s negligence in repairing Lloyd’s bicycle. Appellant contends the business pursuits exclusion in the liability policy excludes coverage. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Richard Patch has been employed for 13 years as a full time laborer and machine operator with the Arkay…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Allied Mutual Casualty Co. v. AskerudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Home Mutual Insurance Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Bankers Standard Insurance Co. v. OlwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by11 opinions
- O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Grossman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Hennings v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GordinierDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Smith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.