Legal Opinion
Bankers Standard Insurance Co. v. Olwell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 4, 1981No. 51213PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
The facts are not in dispute. Defendants Walters owned and occupied with their four children, ages 17, 14, 12 and 10, a home in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, and were insured under a homeowners insurance policy issued by Bankers Standard Insurance Company (Bankers).
The Walters regularly provided day care at their home each week day for James (age 7) and Mark (age 4), children of defendant Wanda Olwell, and were paid $50.00 per week by Mrs. Olwell for that service. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Gulf Insurance Company v. Ronald Tilley, Carol Jo Tilley, Marcella Smith (A Minor), Patricia A. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Stanley v. American Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Peterson v. Highlands Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Moncivais v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Zimmerman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- McCloskey v. Republic InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Western Fire Insurance Co. v. GoodallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.