Legal Opinion

State v. Griego

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2004No. 23,701, 23,706, 23,612PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, J.

{1} These cases concern whether the State may appeal non-final orders from the district court. In Defendant Griego’s ease, the State asks this Court to accept its appeal of the district court’s order denying its motion in limine seeking to restrict impeachment of the victim based on (among other things) his admissions that as a paid police informant, he had falsely stated and exaggerated facts in cases which he worked. In Defendant Coffey’s case, the State asks us to review an order allowing Defendant to withdraw his plea. We hold that neither order constitutes a final order…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. WorleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HeinsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. VasquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. Jade G.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API