State v. Romero
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAMORA, Judge.
{1} This case involves two appeals from two separate criminal actions, involving the State and two different Defendants. Because these appeals share a common issue of first impression, we address them together. The issue before us concerns the effect of the pendency of a defendant’s post-judgment motion for modification of sentence upon the finality of the judgment. In light of recent developments, we conclude that the pendency of such a motion renders appellate review premature and dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
Smith
{2} Defendant was convicted…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Smith v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Thornton v. GambleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. SavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Couch v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. VanderdussenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Barela v. DiazNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Rivas v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.