Legal Opinion
United States v. Matusoff Rental Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 30, 2007No. 3:99cv626PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT; OPINION; CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT ROGER MATUSOFF; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
The Government brought this litigation under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., alleging, inter alia, that the Defendant Roger Matusoff (“Ma-tusoff’) discriminated against prospective tenants at three apartment complexes, located in Xenia, Troy and Sidney, Ohio, on the basis of their race and familial status. 1 The Government seeks to recover monetary damages on behalf of the victims of Matusoffs alleged…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caspar v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Brinkman v. BudishDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Searles v. Germain Ford of Columbus, L.L.C., 08ap-728 (3-24-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- United States v. CochranDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mid-American Specialties, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.