Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. Budish

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 17, 2010No. 2:09-cv-00326PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ISSUANCE OF A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion For Summary Judgment and the Issuance of a Permanent Injunction (doc. 29) and Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 34). Plaintiffs in this case challenge the constitutionality of Ohio Revised Code (“O.R.C.”) § 102.03(A)(4), a statute which prohibits former members of the General Assembly from representing another person or organization before the Ohio…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michigan Chamber of Commerce v. LandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Doe v. Kentucky ex rel. TilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
  3. Boston Correll v. HerringDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  4. Taylor v. HaugaardUnited States District Court · 2019
  5. Frut LLC v. Dongguan City GVODE Electric Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API