Legal Opinion
United States v. Cochran
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 13, 2014No. 4:12-CV-000220-FLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment (DE 102), and motion for sanctions (DE 112). Also before the court is plaintiffs motion to exclude proposed defense expert Bernard E. Kane, Jr., PhD, (“Dr. Kane”) (DE 104). These motions have been fully briefed. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for adjudication. For the following reasons, the court denies defendants’ motions, denies without prejudice plaintiffs motion, and directs scheduling of a bifurcated trial.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In September 2012, plaintiff…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. East River Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Michel v. Workrise Technologies Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2023