Legal Opinion

United States v. Nader Spahi Emperor West Associates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1999No. 97-36149PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we consider whether the government may acquire title by adverse possession in Washington after a failed forfeiture proceeding in which the property was improperly described. We hold that in this case, the United States did not satisfy the elements of adverse possession established under Washington law and cannot acquire title to land not included in the forfeiture action.

I

Nader Spahi and his partnership Emperor West Associates owned a warehouse at 1208 Fourth Street in Anacortes, Washington (“the warehouse property”). Alleging that Spahi had purchased the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Tomlinson v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United States v. Grundy and ThornburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  4. Heikkinen v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bailey v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spahi v. Hughes-Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Estate of Spahi v. Hughes-Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. United States v. Tarek ObaidCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. LazarenkoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  5. United States v. Real Property in Santa Paula, Cal.District Court, C.D. California · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API