Legal Opinion
United States v. Lazarenko
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 15, 2007No. C00-00284 MJJPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) DENYING UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR A RULING THAT THE COURT LACKS JURISDICTION OYER THE LIQUIDATORS’ THREE DEFENSES TO THE MERITS OF THE FORFEITURE AND TO DISMISS THE LIQUIDATORS’ PETITION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM(2) DENYING LIQUIDATORS’ MOTION FOR RETURN OF ILLEGALLY SEIZED FUNDS
JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are two motions. Claimants Liquidators of European Federal Credit Bank, In Liquidation (“Liquidators”) have renewed their Motion For Return Of Illegally Seized Funds (Docket No. 909), which requests the return of assets that were subject to criminal…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. One Gulfstream G-V Jet AircraftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. LazarenkoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- United States v. Glen GalemmoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Glen GalemmoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016