Legal Opinion
Pomona City School District v. Payne
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1935No. Civ. 10459PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J., pro tem.
Pursuant to sections 4.280 and 4.991 of the School Code (Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931, vol. 3, p. 3959), plaintiff school district, in common with other school districts, within the county of Los Angeles, maintains its school funds on deposit in the treasury of said county. The county treasurer, acting under the provisions of section 16% of article XI of the state Constitution as amended, the Depositary Act of 1927 (Stats. 1927, p. 1389), as amended, and the Depositary Act of 1933 (Stats. 1933, p. 642), follows the administrative practice of depositing in state and national…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Lawson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Pasadena Sch. Dist. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- MacMillan Co. v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Agnew v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Board of Education of the Granite School District v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Fort Zumwalt School District v. DickherberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.