Legal Opinion
Liebig v. DeJoy
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 23, 1993No. 92-234-CIV-FTM-17DPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND AND FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause came before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand and Motion for Attorney’s Fees filed on July 24,1992. Upon review of the motions and supporting memorandum, as well as the responsive memorandum filed by Defendant, ROBERT J. DE-JOY (DeJoy), the Court finds that the defendant DeJoy concedes that the Motion for Remand should be granted since jurisdiction is proper in the state court. The Court also finds that the instant case should be remanded because the Notice of Removal was untimely.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- P. P. Farmers' Elevator Company, a Corporation v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Co., and New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Moore v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Maybruck v. HaimDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Schmidt v. National Organization for WomenDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1983
- Imco USA, Inc. v. Title Ins. Co. of MinnesotaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Husk v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
- Gray v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- Martin v. Mentor Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- Gibson v. TinkeyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
- Grace v. Interstate Life & Accident, InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.