Legal Opinion

Maybruck v. Haim

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 24, 1968No. 68 Civ. 2324PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, citizens of New York, sued David Haim, a citizen of Colombia, and his wife Joyce, a citizen of Great Britain, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, alleging fraud, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with plaintiffs’ purchase in 1963 of stock of Dorset, S. A., a Mexican corporation, and the management of its affairs thereafter by the defendants. Personal service was made on Mrs. Haim in New York City on May 10, 1968, and on Mr. Haim in Mexico on June 4, 1968. On June 6, upon a petition for removal…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  2. Transport Indemnity Co. v. Financial Trust Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1972
  3. Perrin v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1974
  4. Irving Trust Co. v. Century Export & Import, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Friedrich v. Whittaker Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1979

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API