Legal Opinion

Baughman v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1936No. Docket No. 40, Calendar No. 38,908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiff sustained a compensable injury September 23, 1926, while in the employ of the defendant railway company. A settlement was arrived at between the parties and on April 5, 1927, defendant railway company had paid plain-tiff $326.67. These payments were made under the mistaken theory that the facts were covered by the Federal employers’ liability act (45 IJSCA, § 51 et seq.).

Plaintiff filed a petition for compensation with the department of labor and industry and on August 2, 1934, the department granted plaintiff an award of $14 per week as of September 24, 19'26, for total disability.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luyk v. HertelMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Smith v. Port Huron Gas & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Anderson v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Baughman v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Julie a Bolen v. Marada Industries IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Stokes v. CHRYSLER LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Stokes v. CHRYSLER LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API