Southern Surety Co. v. Curtis
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The office and factory of defendant M. E. Curtis, who was manufacturing and selling ice cream, was located at 714 North State street, Big Rapids. This address is found in the policy. He accepted the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act as to operations incident to ail of such business, the plaintiff, Southern Surety Company, carrying the risk. Mr. Curtis’ home was at 805, same street. His' daughter, Mary Ruth Curtis, was employed in the office of the factory. She lived at the home with her parents. She carried the money of the business home at night and to the office in the morning.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clifton v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Levanen v. Seneca Copper CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Smith v. Port Huron Gas & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Jones v. St. Joseph Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Haapa v. Metropolitan Life-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chittenden v. JarvisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Hughson v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Holmes v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Tulk v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Baughman v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.