Legal Opinion

Luyk v. Hertel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 133PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The bill herein was filed to set aside findings of the board of labor and industry, under the workmen’s compensation law, on the sole ground of newly-discovered evidence. Upon motion of defendants the bill was dismissed for want of jurisdiction in the court of equity. Plaintiffs appealed.

For the purposes of decision we accept as true every well-pleaded averment of fact stated in the bill. No fraud is alleged. The question is whether findings of fact, made by the board acting within its powers, can be set aside by the court of equity upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence.

Section 5465, 2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Andrejwski v. Wolverine Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In Re HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Smith v. Port Huron Gas & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Martilla v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. American Life Insurance Co. v. BalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Harris v. Diamond Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Autio v. Proksch Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Wayne County Board of Road Commissioners v. Wayne County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API