Legal Opinion

Carter v. Mote

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1979No. TC 36-324, SC 25599PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

This is an action by a pedestrian against the driver of a pickup truck. Plaintiff seeks damages for personal injuries allegedly resulting from the negligence of the defendant in operation of the truck. Upon special interrogatories, the jury returned a verdict finding defendant was not negligent. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered upon the verdict. We affirm.

Both of plaintiffs assignments of error are for failure to give requested instructions. The instructions in question were designed by plaintiff to present her contention that defendant was negligent as a matter of law by reason of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Galego v. KnudsenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. McPherson v. CochranOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hess v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. NaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API