Legal Opinion

State v. Naylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1981No. CA 17295, SC 27488PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

Defendant, tried by jury, was convicted of burglary in the first degree. Defendant was charged with that kind of first degree burglary concerned with unlawful entry, with intent to commit theft, into a building other than a dwelling while being armed with burglar’s tools. 1 There was evidence which, if believed, would have justified only a verdict and conviction of criminal trespass in the second degree. The Court of Appeals affirmed, State v. Naylor, 49 Or App 57, 618 P2d 1311 (1980), holding that the failure to give defendant’s requested instruction on criminal trespass in the second degree…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. WederskiOregon Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Pereida-Alba v. CourseyOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. PittOregon Supreme Court · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API