Legal Opinion

Barnum v. Williams

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1972PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for damages for personal injuries allegedly incurred when the motorcycle he was driving collided with the car the defendant was driving. The jury found for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals, contending the trial court gave two erroneous instructions.

The collision occurred on a rainy day on Vista Avenue, in Portland. The plaintiff was going uphill and rounding an extremely sharp curve to his left. The defendant was coming downhill. Vista Avenue is divided into two lanes by a yellow line. The line is much closer to the curb on the defendant’s side. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. McConnell v. HerronOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Marshall v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Raz v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Nettleton v. JAMESOregon Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Miller v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1978

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API