Legal Opinion

Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2019No. SC S065889PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

**198In this employment action involving Oregon statutory retaliation claims, we decide whether the trial court erred by refusing to give an instruction regarding the "cat's paw" theory of establishing discriminatory or retaliatory motivation. After being terminated by defendant Nike, Inc., plaintiff Douglas Ossanna sued his former employer. Plaintiff alleged, among other things, that Nike had unlawfully fired him in retaliation for his safety complaints and for whistleblowing. Based on his theory that his supervisors held a retaliatory bias against him, plaintiff requested a "cat's paw" jury…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Fayette Long Jeanell Reavis v. Eastfield CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Ralph C. SHAGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN COMPANY and Asgrow Seed Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. RamozOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Summerfield v. OLCCOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. MeiserOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Boyd v. Legacy HealthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API