De Hasque v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. dark, Judge. Action for mandamus by Urban De Has-que against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOwfn, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff in error, in the district court of Oklahoma county, for mandamus to compel defendant in error to accept a shipment of wine tendered by plaintiff in error at Oklahoma City to be delivered to the Reverend John Yan Gastel, a Catholic priest at Guthrie, Oklahoma, and to compel the railway company to accept like shipments, transport and deliver the same, whenever tendered, both intrastate and interstate. The action was brought by plaintiff in error on behalf of all members of the Roman Catholic faith alleging that he is a Roman Catholic priest, and chancellor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Ex Parte Webb.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Reiche v. Smythe, CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Shaw v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- In Re BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.