Legal Opinion

Hidden Meadows Development Co. v. Mills

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1979No. 15027, 15157, and 15188PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

This is an action in equity seeking specific performance of an option to purchase realty-

Defendants, Dee Mills and Evelyn I. Mills (hereinafter “Mills”), granted the option in question in favor of plaintiff’s predecessor in interest. Subsequently, Mills granted a similar option to defendant, Milton C. Christensen (hereinafter “Christensen”). Mills refused to honor plaintiff’s option which resulted in the filing of the initial complaint and the recording of a Lis Pendens in the office of the county recorder. Thereafter, Mills conveyed various interests in the land in question to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hansen v. KohlerUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gumberts v. East Oak Street Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Patterson v. Old Dominion Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1927
  4. Reimann Et Ux. v. Baum Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Western United Dairy Co. v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Blake v. GilbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Timm v. DewsnupUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Richards v. BaumUtah Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API