Reimann Et Ux. v. Baum Et Ux.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOGENSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action in the court below to quiet title to three parcels of land located in Duchesne County, Utah. The judgment of the trial court was that the plaintiffs were record owners and entitled to a decree quieting title in them and were also entitled to recover $840.60 damages for the use of their lands. The judgment further provided that plaintiffs must repay to defendant Baum $652 for taxes he had paid on these lands plus the sum of $975 found by the court to be the reasonable value of permanent improvements made by defendant upon the lands. As a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Searl v. School Dist. No. 2 in Lake Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Rains v. MoulderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Thomas v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Porter v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hidden Meadows Development Co. v. MillsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Coombs v. OuzounianUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Greer v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Madrid v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Allen v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.